Communiqué Issued at the end of a 2-day Multi Stakeholders’ Conference on IDP Protection in Nigeria and the African Union Convention on the protection and Assistance of IDPs held at the Bolton White Hotel, Abuja on 21st and 22nd November 2011

//Communiqué Issued at the end of a 2-day Multi Stakeholders’ Conference on IDP Protection in Nigeria and the African Union Convention on the protection and Assistance of IDPs held at the Bolton White Hotel, Abuja on 21st and 22nd November 2011

Communiqué Issued at the end of a 2-day Multi Stakeholders’ Conference on IDP Protection in Nigeria and the African Union Convention on the protection and Assistance of IDPs held at the Bolton White Hotel, Abuja on 21st and 22nd November 2011

Introduction

The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), Abuja in partnership with the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre / Norwegian Refugee Centre (IDMC/NRC), Geneva, Switzerland organized a 2-day multi stakeholders’ conference on Internally Displace Persons (IDPs). The Conference was aimed at examining the plight of IDPs in Nigeria in the light of relevant international and domestic legal frameworks including the Kampala Convention and designing a plan of action for its ratification and domestication, as well as identifying measures for attaining durable solutions to the challenges of internal displacements in Nigeria.

The Conference was attended by about 75 participants drawn from Civil Society and Faith Based Organizations, the academia, international and national humanitarian assistance providing Agencies, relevant government institutions and the media.  There were four plenary sessions in which nine presentations were made by Resource Persons and representatives of relevant organizations and Agencies. There were interactive sessions with questions and answers and three group work sessions were held to elicit maximum input from participants.

At the end of the 2-day Conference, Participants made the following observations:

  1. Internal Displacement as a result of conflict and violence, natural and human-made disasters as well as development projects is a phenomenon affecting tens of millions of people worldwide, including at least 42 million people displaced by disasters and 27.5 million displaced by conflict and violence worldwide.
  2. Africa is the most affected continent by conflict and violence with an estimated 11.1 million displaced Africans, which does not include the number of IDPs in Nigeria.  Existing figures are contradictory and pose a challenge for assessing the full scope and impact of internal displacement
  3. There is presently inadequate legal, policy and institutional frameworks for effectively addressing the needs of IDPs in Nigeria
  4. The Kampala Convention has not yet been ratified by the required number of countries, including Nigeria and is therefore not yet in force
  5. The response to internal displacements in Nigeria is largely uncoordinated leading to unreliable data comprehensive data, inefficiency, duplication and insufficiency in addressing the needs of affected populations
  6. Internally Displaced Persons are the primary responsibility of the Government of Nigeria which has a constitutional obligation to address their needs irrespective of international instruments
  7. The existing gaps in policy and response to IDP issues make the affected populations vulnerable and susceptible to exploitation, abuse and inhuman conditions
  8. Internally displaced persons have rights which must be protected using all available resources and mechanisms
  9. Nigeria is yet to adopt a National Policy on Internal displacements in spite of having a draft ready and revised twice in the past 5 years
  10. Conflict induced displacements receive so much attention at the expense of other causes
  11. Politicisation of ethnicity is major cause of conflict that results in IDPs in Nigeria.
  12. Absence of good governance and people centred policies are contributory factors to the increase of IDPs even when the number of refugees is reducing in the country.

Recommendations:

Participants also recommended the following:

  1. There is a need for the government to adopt a comprehensive policy, legal and institutional frameworks for the management of internal displacements in Nigeria
  2. The government of Nigeria should develop a coordinated and multi disciplinary strategy for addressing emergencies and the needs of IDPs, including through the collection of data on IDPs across the country and provision adequate funding for the protection and assistance of IDPs.
  3. The Government of Nigeria should clarify the mandates of state institutions responsible for emergency response and IDP management to avoid conflict, duplication and wastage of resources
  4. Relevant state institutions should transcend legalism and seek more ways of collaboration, placing the needs of IDPs ahead of bureaucratic and statutory bottlenecks
  5. The Government of Nigeria should ratify the Kampala Convention to facilitate its coming into force and thereafter domesticate it for enforcement in the country
  6. All stakeholders should develop a right based approach to disaster management and management of internal displacements to ensure that IDPs are accorded all necessary rights as due every other citizen.
  7. Nigeria should develop an EPR strategy as well as develop guidelines for harnessing specialized capacities for emergency response and IDP management
  8. Civil Society and other non state stakeholders should invoke municipal laws and constitutional provisions to make the state fulfil her obligations to IDPs
  9. All stake holders should give more attention to people displaced as a result of government action and development programmes
  10. All stakeholders should promote good governance to reduce conflicts and enhance effective emergency response and management of IDPs.

Conclusion: 

The conference, which was well attended, was participatory with contributions from participants. The participants developed a plan of action which included recommendations on how to work towards technical support, the ratification, domestication and the Kampala Convention in Nigeria. It also included advocacy and awareness raising, capacity building, monitoring and evaluation of assistance and protection, developing a comprehensive IDP data base, preparedness for new incidents and displacements, and how agencies and stakeholders can effectively implement the policies and laws when it’s put in place.

Signed  

Auwal Musa Rafsanjani                                    Kim Mancini Beck

Executive Director                                                 Senior Legal and Training Officer

CISLAC                                                                  IDMC/NRC

By |2011-02-22T06:59:09+00:00February 22nd, 2011|Categories: Communiques|Tags: |6 Comments

About the Author:

6 Comments

  1. a cool way to improve December 10, 2012 at 9:08 am - Reply

    I much like the useful info you provide in your article content.I’ll bookmark your blog site and take a look at yet again listed here usually.I’m relatively convinced I’ll understand loads of new things precise below! Great luck with the up coming!

    • Shruti February 2, 2013 at 10:03 pm - Reply

      This report is parlciutarly timely as it comes at a moment when international NGOs are renegotiating their presence in Darfur. Much of the discussion has implied that the goal is to return to the status quo ante, as of 3 March. Better would be to examine ways in which international assistance can be reprogrammed so as to be more effective and efficient. The last two months has been an (unfortunate) natural experiment in the disruption of assistance, and the feared humanitarian disaster has not transpired, although there have been severe problems in some sectors such as health, water and sanitation. Some other dimensions of the humanitarian response have already come into clearer focus. One of these is the way in which the good aid rations have served as a subsidy to the multi-nodal livelihoods described in the Tufts report. The importance of subsidizing livelihoods is not in question: what needs to be discussed is what is the best form that subsidy should take, how it should be targeted, and how big it should be. Options other than food would be cheaper (transport costs are an inordinate component of the food assistance effort, and it undermines the local food market) and contribute more effectively to sustaining and developing the emergent multi-nodal livelihood system.

      • cislac February 8, 2013 at 1:24 pm - Reply

        thanks for your comment.

  2. gameplay December 28, 2012 at 3:08 pm - Reply
  3. skinny jimmy February 4, 2013 at 7:51 am - Reply

    http://www.cislacnigeria.net owner you are awsome writer

    skinny jimmy

    • cislac February 8, 2013 at 1:16 pm - Reply

      Thanks. We look forward to hear from you.

Leave A Comment

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.